No I am not talking about Star Trek, what I am talking about is the next generation of videogame. Every five to six years or so a new generation as they call it comes out. Every so often an old competitor dies and a new one shows up (referencing the death of Sega and the rise of Microsoft). The problem I have is what constitutes a new generation? The answer at a glance would be next level in graphics. This would seem correct but not so if you look at what past generation systems have done in comparison to the PC. The last 3 to 4 generations have always come out to surpass the PC in graphics then it surpasses them for a little (it is a ritualistic cycle). This latest generation has not done that in the least bit nor will it ever (quote me if you like). What this generation has told us though is who the follower is and who is the innovator. I would like to point out that I was a die hard Sega Genesis and Play Station 1 and 2. This innovation is shown by interphase, the introduction of the thumb stick was a great leap forward done the Play station we have had the joy of the exact same controller for the last 11 years. Play Station market scheme lets use the same stuff and just make it look better. Sure they have added rumble and now the new tilt feature but it is still the same. Lets get something else out of the way I hated the game cube for the most part but the introduction of the wireless controller on a successful scale was truly genius. And of course the PS3 and the Xbox 360 can do but only copy this to this current generation way to be behind and call it new (asses).
I will tell you a secret, we are in 5th generation on my scale. I define the next generation in video games by the interphase. The first generation is of course the arcade. Where else but the arcade did video games start? This generation is typified by the huge joystick with that red or orange ball on the top with the one fire button off to the side. The next is the PC with the keyboard and mouse. It has proved so versatile this gen. has survived the longest, still used to this day. Next is the console with the simple D pad and some action buttons. The fourth is the console with the thumb stick (still used and oh so important). Sadly to say the Ps3 and the Xbox 360 do not had enough innovation to constitute a new generation themselves.
This pains me more then you think. I love almost all the exclusive titles on the Play station line up. Xbox claims to have exclusives but once the PC tech catches up with the consoles; the games come out on PC (prove me wrong people). So what is the fifth and so far final generation? I hate to say it but it is the Wii. The Nintendo Corporation has once again made me feel bad for the choice in console company that I have made my flagship for so long. The ability to aim with my whole arm, to open doors with a flip of the wrist or to swing the master sword for the first time is more then worth the 250 bucks. The main complaint is “the graphics are not that good.” True, it does have less graphics but it plays like a dream and is fun as hell. You are telling me that if a game looks not top of the line but has great gameplay you will write it off? Are you telling me then that the system with the best specs will always win out? But note that the Nintendo DS beats the PSP in sale every month it has half the specs as the PSP. Also remember the Dreamcast, it was far superior but it failed as well. I will not say that the PS3 and the Xbox 360 are bad systems or not fun but please stop copying each other and come out with something new.